Desi Hardcore Professional: SHANTA KAND NEONX (includes better quality)

[whizkido]

Thank you for posting uncut quality,moderators this is not watered down version this is uncut quality

problem lies with uploader kingkk...he is not allowing other uploaders to upload quality contents..simply reporting all contents...our moderator also without checking quality deleting all threads...injustice to quality uploaders...

@Bullet_Prakash  That is the reason I am holding back for now. If mods have no issue with this, I can post everything from Neonx.vip.

Those who know me, in old masaladesi, we always prioritized best quality first. Us mods also used to have mediainfo on our pc to compare quality if there was a dispute.

This MD is nowhere near that. Godpa ran 4 servers at tandem for 4 sites - ff, xp, md & piccrazy.

Gifs

[chicmagnet]

Those who know me, in old masaladesi, we always prioritized best quality first. Us mods also used to have mediainfo on our pc to compare quality if there was a dispute.

This MD is nowhere near that. Godpa ran 4 servers at tandem for 4 sites - ff, xp, md & piccrazy.

As some one who taught you moderation in old md (assuming you're the same kido), let me remind few facts. It is almost impossible to create another forum like old MD. That is from a different era. When old MD (Filescheap > Filesquick > Masaladesi) was started, it was the first of its kind to have desi adult videos. During that era, there was not much competition (Masalaboard was barely trying to match) or alternate sources of desi videos. Old MD was the single point of collection where all videos were in one place. Like you've mentioned GF ran different servers and sites (in addition to those 4, we had BG too). Even with all such content, the old MD and XP could no longer survive because of primarily two reasons.

1. Cost of running all those sites was getting too much and could not be affordable any more. Income was going down and down as people were getting lots of choices.
2. Alternate sources of desi videos were plenty and MD was no longer the only source of large collection. People could easily find alternate sources such as social media & what not, using their mobile.

These days there are even more sources and alternatives. This forum was started with an aim to bring back old collection. It's an ambitious attempt. But this forum software has way too many limitations compared to the old MD and we're forced to live with what we have. So no point in comparing this. But the amount of effort taken by the admin to do his best should be appreciated. Without much help or support, he is single handedly trying his best.

Creating a site like old MD might be possible in this day and age only if you are ready for the following:

1. You should spend full time on the site only. No other commitment must be there.
2. You should be willing to spend up to 100K USD from your own pocket every year.
3. You should be having contacts at the central ministerial level across all parties so no matter who comes to power you can work with them and they don't screw your site just because it has adult content.
4. You should have a dedicated team of 10+ mods team who are willing to work for free.
5. You should find additional sources of income to pay for ever increasing server costs, but not spend time on earning those expenses because the time should all be spent on the site.

Basically, you should plan for maintaining a site assuming that you get absolutely no income from it. Only expenses, about 100K USD every year. Then you have chances of running it. Otherwise, need to continue living with what we have

Gifs

[chicmagnet]

@whizkido You should know in old MD, we used to merge better quality and it gets merged with the existing quality. So the most recent copy will be at the bottom. People who don't understand all the nitty gritty of forum features and moderation limitations some how magically expect to have the recent copy at the top and accuse you if you don't do what they want, lol

Gifs

[High Definition]

@chicmagnet No disrespect to you or anyone, but what if true quality content (only taken from the source) post includes existing user's FF links too with proper credits to them, as many users want to post releases in [1080P/720P] with original quality and I just gave a short. If merging in reverse is not possible, then at least in the past I contacted you with a similar situation Also, with user @nathan56 I included his FF link in the same post (Post Link - https://masaladesi.club/thread-desi-xxx-...indi-audio) and also credited him for his work. He was happy with that and even you didn't have any issues either. How can reasonable differences in views to make MD better become a pain to anyone?

Gifs

[whizkido]

Those who know me, in old masaladesi, .... Godpa ran 4 servers at tandem for 4 sites - ff, xp, md & piccrazy.

As some one who taught you moderation in old md (assuming you're the same kido), let me remind few facts....

Im the same one and only though Im not a "kid" anymore    . Yours seem to be a new id since I dont remember any mod by that name. 

Im aware of the rigmaroles and GF was unable to keep up the cost of running multiple servers as well as adding new ones at the end. My mention of it was merely due discourse. 

@whizkido You should know in old MD, we used to merge better quality and it gets merged with the existing quality. So the most recent copy will be at the bottom. People who don't understand all the nitty gritty of forum features and moderation limitations some how magically expect to have the recent copy at the top and accuse you if you don't do what they want, lol

Yes, THIS was my point. HD always gained priority. And by HD, I mean untouched files in their highest resolution, or direct rips from stream using python or whatever. Not copy paste from other sites which happen everywhere. Sometimes Ive seen poor res watermarked clips posted in hd section in the past and even on reporting they were kept as is instead of being moved to sd.

Now Im not saying low res should be ignored. Those have their use too esp for people with limited bandwidth. But the HD section should be reserved only for true high definition 1080p or above. That, again, is my only contention.

As for the merging, for better res posts, I remember we used to do a soft merge, keeping the posts separate for a limited time, usually 3 days to a week before completing the merge. Sometimes when a better res was posted months after the og, we even kept the posts permanently separate.

Gifs

[chicmagnet]

Yours seem to be a new id since I dont remember any mod by that name. 

That's because some spammer already used my id and got banned before I joined this forum.

As for the merging, for better res posts, I remember we used to do a soft merge, keeping the posts separate for a limited time, usually 3 days to a week before completing the merge. Sometimes when a better res was posted months after the og, we even kept the posts permanently separate.

We don't have that feature in this forum. So we're limited with what can be done.

Gifs

[whizkido]

Yours seem to be a new id since I dont remember any mod by that name. 

That's because some spammer already used my id and got banned before I joined this forum.

As for the merging, for better res posts, I remember we used to do a soft merge, keeping the posts separate for a limited time, usually 3 days to a week before completing the merge. Sometimes when a better res was posted months after the og, we even kept the posts permanently separate.

We don't have that feature in this forum. So we're limited with what can be done.

Oh.. what was ur id in old md?

Gifs